Dasuki’s detention: Disquiet as ECOWAS Court adjourns judgement indefinitely

7 years ago

Dasuki’s detention: Disquiet as ECOWAS Court adjourns judgement indefinitely

The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Community Court of Justice has adjourned sine die (indefinitely) judgment in the case of former National Security Adviser (NSA), Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd) against the Federal Government, in which he challenged his detention by government since December 2015 in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS).
The court, presided over by Justice Friday Nwoke had on May 16 reserved judgment till yesterday after taking final argument from Dasuki’s lawyer Mr. Robert Emukperuo and government lawyer Mr. Tijani Gazali.

However, journalists, lawyers and other observers who stormed the regional court in Abuja were taken aback when they were told that the much awaited verdict of the court was not ready and that a new date for judgment would be communicated to lawyers.

Many were turned back by security men who said the court management had mandated them to inform all present that judgment was not ready.

Dasuki had dragged the Federal Government before the ECOWAS Court, praying the regional court to intervene in his detention without trial since December last year.

The ex-NSA asked the court to void the detention, the seizure of his properties and bar government from further detaining him without a lawful court order.

In the court action instituted by his counsel Mr. Robert Emukpoeruo, Dasuki asked the court to award in his favor a sum of N500 million as compensatory damages for the alleged unlawful invasion of his house, detention, seizure of properties and infringement on his rights.

He claimed that government had put him on trial in three different high courts on corruption charges where he was granted bail and that after his bail, he was re-arrested on December 29, 2015 and has since been held incommunicado without lawful court order.

Dasuki told the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice that the federal government has no legal or moral justification for his continued incarceration since December last year.

The ex-NSA, who argued through his counsel while making his final address, predicated his stance on Sections 293-296 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act ACJA 2015 which outlines the procedure for keeping a suspect in detention for not more than two weeks.

“To accentuate the illegality of the arrest and detention of the applicant, the ACJA 2015, S.293 to 296 thereof, set out the procedure for the detention of any person pending trial or investigation. And in summary, that procedure requires judicial intervention by a magistrate for it to be carried out and the maximum detention time-frame is two weeks,” he submitted.

Emukperuo had earlier filed an application to amend the originating application by including additional reliefs, a request the court granted, ordering the defendant to respond, if any, within 15 days, to the issues raised in the amendment.

He prayed the court to order the release of his client and as well order the government to pay N500 million as compensation to Dasuki.

He recalled how several courts had granted Dasuki bail and how President Muhammadu Buhari had stated in a media chat that the ex-NSA cannot just be released.

He said his client’s arrest and detention by the defendant is without any legal justification because it was not backed with any court order.

“The critical issue that needs to be resolved is whether there is any legal justification for the detention of the applicant by the defendant”, he said, adding that the only justification in the amended statement of defence adduced by the defendant for detaining the applicant is the recourse to national security.

“They have not adduced before this court any judicial procedure that they have relied on in incarcerating the applicant.

“They have equally not relayed to the court any domestic legislation whatsoever to justify the detention of the applicant.

“My lord I submit that this is a classic case of arbitrary and illegal arrest”, he added.

The counsel further submitted that the government has defied all known legal instruments or legislation by not following its own laws.

He said apart from its complete disdain for the laws of the land, government has also not followed judicial orders given by courts of competent jurisdiction.

Emukperuo said on the issue of being in possession of arms, Dasuki was granted bail on self-recognition and the Ministry of Justice did not oppose the application for bail, wondering why they had to still keep him in detention having not opposed the bail application if they knew he was a security risk.

“It is a spurious defence conceived in bad faith, and I urge the court to dismiss it”, he pleaded.

But the Federal Government through its counsel, Mr. Tijani Gazali, had argued a preliminary objection against Dasuki on the ground that he ought to have filed a contempt charge against the government for alleged disobedience to court order on the bail granted him. The ECOWAS Court however ruled that the case of the plaintiff was on his fundamental rights and has nothing to do with the domestic court.